logo CityLand
      • Home
      • About CityLand
      • CityLand Sponsors
      • Filings & Decisions
      • Commentary
      • Archive
      • Resources
      • CityLaw
      • Current Issue

    Trespass Damages Of $750,000 Upheld


    CityLaw  •  Trespass
    08/20/2018   •    (2) Comments

    Image credit: pixabay.com

    Land developer’s construction of building encroached upon neighbors’ land. Britton Property, Inc., a developer, constructed a new six-story residential building located on Britton Avenue, in Elmhurst Queens. Britton installed 17 steel I-beams, a roof cap, and a brick façade that physically encroached on surrounding properties and the properties’ airspace. Britton’s architectural plans provided for the beams to be installed temporarily on the surrounding properties, but Britton failed to remove them.

    The adjacent homeowners sued Britton for trespassing on their properties. Supreme Court Justice Valerie Nelson ruling in favor of the homeowners, entered a permanent injunction forcing Britton to remove the beams, and awarded $750,000 in compensatory damages. Judge Nelson declined to award the homeowners punitive damages. Both Britton and the homeowners appealed.

    The Appellate Division, Second Department, agreed with the homeowners that Britton had trespassed, but reduced the damages award to $325,000. The Appellate Division ruled that the homeowners’ injuries did not support the $750,000 award because removal of the beams would remedy the harm. The Appellate Division approved, however, of an award of punitive damages, reasoning that Britton’s intentional conduct warranted punitive damages. The court awarded the homeowners an additional $250,000 in punitive damages.

     

    Arcamone-Makinano v. Britton Property, Inc., 67 N.Y.S.3d 290 (2nd Dep’t 2017).

    By: Erika Pedersen (Erika is a New York Law School Student, Class of 2019.)

     

    Share this:

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    Tags : damages, Elmhurst, punitive damages, Queens, residential building, trespass
    Category : CityLaw

    Responses to “Trespass Damages Of $750,000 Upheld”

    1. Wayne BAILEY says:
      August 20, 2018 at 10:50 am

      Title states $7,500 article states $750,000 which is correct?

      Reply
      • drodriguez says:
        August 20, 2018 at 11:04 am

        Thank you. The correct amount is $750,000 and the title has been corrected.

        Reply

    Comment on this article

    Click here to cancel reply.

    Subscribe To Free Alerts

    In a Reader

    Desktop Reader Bloglines Google Live Netvibes Newsgator Yahoo! What's This?

    Follow Us on Social Media

    twitterfacebook

    Search

    Search by Category

      City Council
      CityLaw
      City Planning Commission
      Board of Standards & Appeals
      Landmarks Preservation Commission
      Economic Development Corporation
      Housing Preservation & Development
      Administrative Decisions
      Court Decisions
      Filings and Decisions
      CityLand Profiles

    Search by Date

    © 1997-2010 New York Law School | 185 West Broadway, New York, NY 10013 | 212.431.2100 | Privacy | Terms | Code of Conduct | DMCA | Policies
    loading Cancel
    Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
    Email check failed, please try again
    Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.