logo CityLand
      • Home
      • About CityLand
      • CityLand Sponsors
      • Filings & Decisions
      • Commentary
      • Archive
      • Resources
      • CityLaw
      • Current Issue

    Search results for "Coney Island, Brooklyn"

    Rezoning encourages medium- and low-rise development

    City Planning Commission  •  Rezoning  •  Midwood, Brooklyn

    Midwood Rezoning: Proposed Rezoning Map. Used with permission of the New York City Department of City Planning. All rights reserved.

    Midwood rezoned to encourage appropriate higher density development. On February 22, 2006, the Planning Commission unanimously approved a rezoning impacting 80 predominantly residential blocks of Midwood, Brooklyn. The rezoning was proposed in response to out-of-scale development permitted by the R6 district’s community facility bonuses that increased FAR from 2.43 to 4.8. Designed to preserve the character of both low-density small homes and high-density apartment buildings, the proposal down-zones portions of 56 blocks into several lower-density districts (R2, R4-1, R5, and R5B), and up-zones portions of 55 blocks into R7A districts. The down-zoned areas will curb over-development by allowing fewer community facility bonuses and by requiring street wall height limits, side yards, and off-street parking. The up-zoning, predominantly along Avenue M, Ocean Avenue, and Kings Highway, will allow medium-density contextual residential development with an FAR of 4.0 and a 60-foot street wall height. The R7A district will also require that developers provide parking for half of the units available as well as a quality housing program. Additionally, a C2-3 commercial overlay will be reduced along Avenue M, 10 blocks along Avenue J will be rezoned C4-4A, and new C2-3 commercial overlays will be created along Coney Island Avenue.

    At the Commission’s January 11, 2006 public hearing, speakers included representatives of Council Member Michael C. Nelson, Community Board 14, and the Council of Jewish Organizations of Flatbush, along with residents; all of whom testified in favor of the proposal, saying that it was effective in both preserving character and allowing new development. Speakers in opposition included developers, property owners, and residents who argued that the neighborhood had a greater need for new housing than was permitted in the rezoning and that the changes would impede their ability to redevelop their properties. (more…)

    Tags : Brooklyn Community Board 14, Midwood Rezoning
    Date: 03/15/2006
    Leave a Comment
    1. Pages:
    2. «
    3. 1
    4. 2
    5. 3
    6. 4
    7. 5
    8. 6
    9. 7
    10. 8
    11. 9

    Subscribe To Free Alerts


    Follow Us on Social Media

    twitterfacebook

    Search

    Search by Category

      City Council
      CityLaw
      City Planning Commission
      Board of Standards & Appeals
      Landmarks Preservation Commission
      Economic Development Corporation
      Housing Preservation & Development
      Administrative Decisions
      Court Decisions
      Filings and Decisions
      CityLand Profiles

    Search by Date

    © 1997-2010 New York Law School | 185 West Broadway, New York, NY 10013 | 212.431.2100 | Privacy | Terms | Code of Conduct | DMCA | Policies
     

    Loading Comments...