logo CityLand
      • Home
      • About CityLand
      • CityLand Sponsors
      • Filings & Decisions
      • Commentary
      • Archive
      • Resources
      • CityLaw
      • Current Issue

    Rainbow Room Renovation & Restoration Approved by Landmarks Commission


    Landmarks Preservation Commission  •  Certification of Appropriateness  •  Midtown, Manhattan
    01/11/2013   •    Leave a Comment
    Rendering of Rainbow Room renovation. Image Courtesy: Gabellini Sheppard.

    Rendering of Rainbow Room renovation. Image Courtesy: Gabellini Sheppard.

    Approved plans would retain and restore remaining original elements of interior landmark, while replacing the dance floor and altering the wall, floor, and ceiling surfaces. The Landmarks Preservation Commission voted to approve a renovation plan for the Rainbow Room on January 8, 2013. The interior landmark, on the 65th floor of Rockefeller Plaza, was designated by Landmarks on October 13, 2012 and approved by the City Council on December 18, 2012.

    The Rainbow Room, which was first opened in 1934, was designed by the firm Associated Architects, under the supervision of architect Wallace K. Harrison and interior designer Elena Bachman-Schmidt. The historic nightclub and restaurant features double-height windows, opulent chandeliers and sconces, a circular dance floor, and a domed ceiling. The room underwent an extensive renovation in 1987, overseen by architect Hugh Hardy. The Rainbow Room has been closed since 2009.

    Cas Stachelberg, of preservation consultants Higgins Quasebarth & Partners LLC, introduced the proposal, and stated that the intent is to “regain and reclaim the elegance and exuberance” of the Rainbow Room. Stachelberg added that the plan would preserve the room’s significant historic features while introducing a new color palette. He testified that the proposal would “allow the room to move forward into this century.”

    Architect Michael Gabellini, of the firm Gabellini Sheppard, stated that the design intent was to “preserve all the original architectural features,” and that alterations would be purely “cosmetic.” Gabellini also said the goal of the project was to revivify the Rainbow Room’s “spirit as a premier entertainment, social & theatrical venue.” Floor, wall, and ceiling surfaces would be altered, though the existing configuration of the room would be maintained. New modern lighting would be installed, as would air conditioning and sound systems, and older duct work would be removed. Fabric on the room’s walls, originally brown or plum is currently in poor condition, and would be redone with pearl-grey material. The ceiling would be painted in shades of white. The circular, rotating dance floor would be redone in oak and rosewood. Gabellini noted that the existing dance floor is the room’s third and was not the original. A new carpet would be installed in a “Deco-inspired” pattern. One missing chandelier would be replaced, and the others restored. Sconces and railings would also be refurbished.

    The Historic Districts Council’s Nadezhda Williams found the proposal appropriate, but asked that “utmost attention” be paid to the wall coverings, and also questioned the need for a redesigned dance floor. Chair Robert B. Tierney stated that Manhattan Community Board 5 had issued a resolution deeming the project appropriate.

    Chair Tierney recommended approval of the “very careful, sensitive job,” and was pleased to see the recent designation so sensitively handled. Commissioner Libby Ryan said she “found nothing to object to” in the proposal, and was convinced that the landmark was in “quite competent hands.” Commissioner Christopher Moore said he was glad to see “the continuation of one of the most special rooms in the world.” Commissioner Michael Goldblum praised the “respectful” proposal, and found it especially so given the “evanescent typology” of restaurants. He did, however, concur with the Historic Districts Council that the dance floor should be restored, rather than renovated, saying it was an “iconic” feature of the interior, and should be “treated as sacredly as possible.” Commissioner Margery Perlmutter determined that the application’s combination of “actual restoration and … contemporary approaches to interior design” was the “right way to go.”

    The Commissioners voted unanimously to approve the certificate of appropriateness.

    LPC: The Rainbow Room, 30 Rockefeller Center, Manhattan (13-8503) (Jan. 8, 2013) (Architect: Gabellini Sheppard).

    Share this:

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    Tags : Historic Districts Council, Rockefeller Plaza, The Rainbow Room, Tishman Speyer
    Category : Landmarks Preservation Commission

    Comment on this article

    Click here to cancel reply.

    Subscribe To Free Alerts


    Follow Us on Social Media

    twitterfacebook

    Search

    Search by Category

      City Council
      CityLaw
      City Planning Commission
      Board of Standards & Appeals
      Landmarks Preservation Commission
      Economic Development Corporation
      Housing Preservation & Development
      Administrative Decisions
      Court Decisions
      Filings and Decisions
      CityLand Profiles

    Search by Date

    © 1997-2010 New York Law School | 185 West Broadway, New York, NY 10013 | 212.431.2100 | Privacy | Terms | Code of Conduct | DMCA | Policies
     

    Loading Comments...