logo CityLand
      • Home
      • About CityLand
      • CityLand Sponsors
      • Filings & Decisions
      • Commentary
      • Archive
      • Resources
      • CityLaw
      • Current Issue

    NOV for low parapet upheld


    Administrative Decisions  •  Environmental Control Board  •  Upper West Side, Manhattan
    12/15/2011   •    (2) Comments

    Repairs to building subject to 1938 Building Code triggered new minimum height requirements. In February, June, and October of 2010, Buildings issued notices of violation to the owner of 331 Columbus Avenue, Manhattan. The issuing officer in each instance observed the same violation of the 2008 Construction Codes: brick parapet walls on the roof were not 42 inches in height.

    At a hearing, the owner conceded that the walls in question were less than 42 inches in height, but argued that the 1938 Building Code, and not the 2008 Building Code, applied to the building. The owner submitted a 1988 certificate of occupancy in support of this contention, and also submitted a Buildings- approved application from 2007 which requested review under the 1938 Building Code. The application sought to replace and repair the parapet walls.

    Buildings countered that the parapet walls would have remained “grandfathered” under the 1938 Building Code had the 2007 work not been performed. But, Buildings continued, performing the approved work in 2007 subjected the work to a 1960 amendment to the 1938 Building Code. The amendment required that parapet walls have a height of 42 inches. An ALJ ruled against the owner, and the owner appealed to the Environmental Control Board.

    The Board denied the appeal, ruling that the owner had violated the cited section of the 2008 Construction Codes by failing to comply with the 1938 Building Code, as amended in 1960. Once the owner elected to alter the building in 2007 under the 1938 Building Code, compliance with the 1960 amendment became necessary.

    NYC v. 60 West 76th Street, ECB Appeal No. 1100643 (Sept. 22, 2011).

    Share this:

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    Tags : 1938 Building Code, 2008 Building Code, 2008 Construction Codes, brick parapet walls
    Category : Administrative Decisions

    Responses to “NOV for low parapet upheld”

    1. Julia Carlson says:
      September 24, 2014 at 10:01 am

      I would imagine repairing parapet walls is a challenge! I wonder how quickly they’ll be able to get this done. It’s interesting that they would make them redo all the walls of the building. http://www.aaa1masonry.com/services/brick-rebuilding/#parapet-rebuilding-and-repair

      Reply
    2. Manny says:
      November 12, 2015 at 4:05 pm

      What amendment was issued in 1960 and where is there a copy of it?

      Reply

    Comment on this article

    Click here to cancel reply.

    Subscribe To Free Alerts

    In a Reader

    Desktop Reader Bloglines Google Live Netvibes Newsgator Yahoo! What's This?

    Follow Us on Social Media

    twitterfacebook

    Search

    Search by Category

      City Council
      CityLaw
      City Planning Commission
      Board of Standards & Appeals
      Landmarks Preservation Commission
      Economic Development Corporation
      Housing Preservation & Development
      Administrative Decisions
      Court Decisions
      Filings and Decisions
      CityLand Profiles

    Search by Date

    © 1997-2010 New York Law School | 185 West Broadway, New York, NY 10013 | 212.431.2100 | Privacy | Terms | Code of Conduct | DMCA | Policies