logo CityLand
      • Home
      • About CityLand
      • CityLand Sponsors
      • Filings & Decisions
      • Commentary
      • Archive
      • Resources
      • CityLaw
      • Current Issue

    City’s Claim for Tree Damage Dismissed


    CityLaw  •  Parks
    11/09/2018   •    (1) Comment

    Image credit: NYC Department of Parks & Recreation.

    Sidewalk contractor injured City trees during sidewalk reconstruction. A property owner hired Tri-Rail Construction, Inc., to repair the sidewalk adjacent to the owner’s property. During the course of the sidewalk repair work Tri-Rail injured City-owned trees. The City sued Tri-Rail for money damages for the injury to the City trees.

    In support of its civil suit for damages the New York City Department of Parks & Recreation invoked Parks rule 56 RCNY 5-01(c) which states that, in addition to all other legal remedies, Parks shall seek civil damages from any person who cuts, removes or destroys any trees under the jurisdiction of Parks without Parks permission. A civil lawsuit for damages is in addition to criminal punishment of up to six months imprisonment and a fine of up to $15,000 for anyone who injures a City tree.

    Tri-Rail moved to dismiss the complaint for damages. Supreme Court Justice Eileen A. Rakower upheld the complaint and Tri-Rail appealed.

    The Appellate Division, First Department, reversed, ruled that the City lacked capacity to sue for civil damages, dismissed the complaint, and invalidated Parks rule that authorized Parks to sue for injury to City trees. The Appellate Division ruled that the City of New York lacked a common-law right to sue. A city’s right to sue for damages must be derived from enabling statutes and the relevant enabling statutes regarding the cutting, removal and destruction of City trees did not authorize the City to recover money damages for injury to the City’s trees. The Appellate Division concluded that the Parks rule authorizing the civil lawsuit was out of harmony with the enabling statute and was therefore invalid.

     

    City of New York v. Tri-Rail Cons’t, Inc., 76 N.Y.S.3d 404 (1st Dep’t 2018).

     

    By: Ross Sandler

    Share this:

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    Tags : 56 RCNY 5-01(c), Court, reconstruction, sidewalk, trees, Tri-Rail Construction
    Category : CityLaw

    One Response to “City’s Claim for Tree Damage Dismissed”

    1. John OShea says:
      September 14, 2019 at 4:08 pm

      Thanks for publishing this as I am considering suit against NYC to enable repair of damage to my property due to city owned tree roots, which start on public right of way and extend into my private property.

      The permitting process is onerous; NYC Parks must give permit before I can rip up my driveway and rid my property of these roots which has caused large rupture in concrete walking surface. This includes hiring of certified arborist and multiple meetings to discuss options.

      Reply

    Comment on this article

    Click here to cancel reply.

    Subscribe To Free Alerts

    In a Reader

    Desktop Reader Bloglines Google Live Netvibes Newsgator Yahoo! What's This?

    Follow Us on Social Media

    twitterfacebook

    Search

    Search by Category

      City Council
      CityLaw
      City Planning Commission
      Board of Standards & Appeals
      Landmarks Preservation Commission
      Economic Development Corporation
      Housing Preservation & Development
      Administrative Decisions
      Court Decisions
      Filings and Decisions
      CityLand Profiles

    Search by Date

    © 1997-2010 New York Law School | 185 West Broadway, New York, NY 10013 | 212.431.2100 | Privacy | Terms | Code of Conduct | DMCA | Policies
     

    Loading Comments...
     

      loading Cancel
      Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
      Email check failed, please try again
      Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.