New owners proposed to modify fifth-floor addition previously denied by Landmarks. On March 16, 2010, Landmarks voted to deny a proposal to modify and legalize a one-story rooftop addition built without Landmarks’ approval at 12-14 West 68th Street in the Upper West Side/Central Park West Historic District. The building’s previous owners, Thomas Haines and Polly Cleveland, built the 506 square-foot, fifth-floor addition on top of a 1925-era studio building added to the rear of a Queen Anne-style mansion built in 1895.

Haines and Cleveland applied to Landmarks to legalize the addition. At an April 2009 hearing, architect Lester Evan Tour testified that he did not intend to bypass Landmarks when designing the addition. Evan Tour claimed that Buildings had failed to flag the property as landmarked, and that the plan examiners also missed the oversight. He argued that the addition was only minimally visible from the street and it related well to its host building and surroundings. Landmarks voted unanimously to deny legalization in June 2009. According to the Commissioners, the addition was too tall and made the rear building inappropriately higher than the main house. 6 CityLand 92 (July 15, 2009). (read more…)

Architect testified that Buildings’ database failed to indicate that West 68th Street property was located within landmarked district. At its April 14th public hearing, Landmarks considered the legalization of a one-story, fifth-floor addition to a residential building at 12-14 West 68th Street in the Upper West Side/Central Park West Historic District. The 506 square-foot addition was built onto a 1925 studio building, itself built as an addition at the rear of the main 1895 Queen Annestyle house. The Commission also considered the legalization of an eight-foot wrought-iron fence.

The project’s architect, Lester Evan Tour, testified that he was hired to design the addition in 2004, and when he filed for permits with Buildings in September of 2005, the property’s landmark status did not appear in Buildings’ database. Plan examiners also failed to catch the oversight. Evan Tour took responsibility for the transgression, but added that he never intended to bypass Landmarks review. Evan Tour also stated that he had endeavored to create an addition that related well to its surroundings; he designed the addition with bricks similar to those already on the facade and with salvaged terra cotta capstones from the parapet wall the addition replaced. (read more…)