logo CityLand
      • Home
      • About CityLand
      • CityLand Sponsors
      • Filings & Decisions
      • Commentary
      • Archive
      • Resources
      • CityLaw
      • Current Issue

    Suit filed challenging Ikea’s approval


    Court Decisions  •  Article 78 Petition  •  Red Hook, Brooklyn
    03/15/2005   •    Leave a Comment

    Suit claims environmental study was flawed and Council’s approval violated City land use plans. Five Brooklyn residents and the Coalition to Revitalize Our Waterfront Now, a citizen group formed in 2003 to advocate for sustainable waterfront development in Red Hook, filed suit in Supreme Court on February 8, 2005, seeking to void the City’s approval of an Ikea superstore on a 22-acre site along Brooklyn’s Erie Basin.

    Ikea received the City’s final approval in October 13, 2004 for a proposed 346,000 sq.ft. furniture store that would be the largest Ikea in the U.S. The development required a zoning amendment, special approvals to exceed size and height limits, and a finding that it was consistent with the City’s coastal zone management plan.

    The article 78 petition claims that the City acted arbitrarily by approving a flawed environmental impact statement, a zoning text change that constituted illegal “spot zoning” and a development that conflicted with the City’s zoning plans. The petition, which named the Commission, its Chair Amanda M. Burden and others, contends that the City’s FEIS underestimated the car trips to Ikea and the volume of customers that will use Red Hook’s narrow streets. It also failed to study the project’s impact on Red Hook’s strengthened residential market or the ultimate loss of 22- acres of working waterfront.

    The petition further alleges that Ikea’s approval conflicted with Redhook’s 197-a plan and the City’s 1992 Waterfront Plan, which designated Erie Basin as an area where working waterfront uses should be fostered because it is the only fully protected deep-water, waterfront area in Brooklyn. Under the Waterfront Plan, Erie Basin is one of only six working waterfront areas in the City.

    The City has until April 15, 2005 to respond based on an extension granted by the petitioners.

    For details on the approval of Ikea’s five separate applications by the City Council and the Planning Commission, see 1 CityLand 20 (November 15, 2004), 1 CityLand 5 (October 15, 2004).

    Coalition to Revitalize Our Waterfront Now v. NYC, Index No. 101955/05, (Feb. 8, 2004) (N.Y.Cty.Sup.Ct.) (Antonia Levine Bryson, Esq., Urban Environmental Law Center, for Coalition).

    Share this:

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    Tags : Coalition to Revitalize Our Waterfront Now v. NYC, Index No. 101955/05
    Category : Court Decisions

    Comment on this article

    Click here to cancel reply.

    Subscribe To Free Alerts


    Follow Us on Social Media

    twitterfacebook

    Search

    Search by Category

      City Council
      CityLaw
      City Planning Commission
      Board of Standards & Appeals
      Landmarks Preservation Commission
      Economic Development Corporation
      Housing Preservation & Development
      Administrative Decisions
      Court Decisions
      Filings and Decisions
      CityLand Profiles

    Search by Date

    © 1997-2010 New York Law School | 185 West Broadway, New York, NY 10013 | 212.431.2100 | Privacy | Terms | Code of Conduct | DMCA | Policies