logo CityLand
      • Home
      • About CityLand
      • CityLand Sponsors
      • Filings & Decisions
      • Commentary
      • Archive
      • Resources
      • CityLaw
      • Current Issue

    SoHo-Cast Iron District Extension Heard


    Landmarks Preservation Commission  •  Designation Hearing  •  SoHo, Manhattan
    11/15/2009   •    Leave a Comment

    Proposed extension of SoHo-Cast Iron district.

    Proposed extension includes two subsections consisting of 135 properties. Landmarks heard extensive testimony on a proposal to extend the SoHo- Cast Iron Historic District to include 135 properties in two subsections bordering the east and west sides of the existing district. The western subsection includes buildings on West Broadway’s western side between Houston and Grand Streets. The eastern subsection is larger and includes portions of Crosby, Lafayette, and Centre Streets between Houston and Canal Streets.

    The proposed extension includes cast-iron and masonry commercial buildings from the post- Civil War era that are similar in period and style to buildings within the historic district’s current boundaries. The extension also features architecture in the Italianate, Second Empire, and Romanesque Revival styles. Mary Beth Betts, Landmarks’ research director, said Landmarks had received several expansion proposals from community groups and individuals, and noted that the submitted proposal represented the results of a staff-conducted survey.

    Residents, business owners, and elected officials testified both in favor and in opposition to the proposal. SoHo gallery owner and resident, Ivan Karp, spoke about the “unified character” of the district’s architecture and supported extending the district. Council Member Alan J. Gerson, State Senator Daniel L. Squadron, and Manhattan Borough President Scott M. Stringer supported extending the district. Stringer testified that the extension would maintain the area’s “cohesive streetscape and architectural integrity.” Andrew Dolkart, a professor of historic preservation at Columbia University, noted that while the proposed extension contained more masonry buildings than cast-iron buildings it still represented important commercial architecture of the period and constituted “a spectacularly unified group.”

    Michael Slattery, senior vice president of the Real Estate Board of New York, spoke in opposition, testifying that the buildings in the extension did not meet the standards of the landmarks law. He said the inclusion of “lesser-quality properties” would diminish the SoHo-Cast Iron Historic District. A SoHo property owner argued that Landmarks should remove the proposal’s entire western subsection.

    Landmarks did not set a date for a designation vote.

    LPC: SoHo-Cast Iron Historic District Extension, Manhattan (LP-2362) (Oct. 27, 2009).

    Share this:

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    Tags : SoHo-Cast Iron Historic District, SoHo-Cast Iron Historic District Extension
    Category : Landmarks Preservation Commission

    Comment on this article

    Click here to cancel reply.

    Subscribe To Free Alerts


    Follow Us on Social Media

    twitterfacebook

    Search

    Search by Category

      City Council
      CityLaw
      City Planning Commission
      Board of Standards & Appeals
      Landmarks Preservation Commission
      Economic Development Corporation
      Housing Preservation & Development
      Administrative Decisions
      Court Decisions
      Filings and Decisions
      CityLand Profiles

    Search by Date

    © 1997-2010 New York Law School | 185 West Broadway, New York, NY 10013 | 212.431.2100 | Privacy | Terms | Code of Conduct | DMCA | Policies
     

    Loading Comments...