logo CityLand
      • Home
      • About CityLand
      • CityLand Sponsors
      • Filings & Decisions
      • Commentary
      • Archive
      • Resources
      • CityLaw
      • Current Issue

    Replica of illegally removed balcony approved


    Landmarks Preservation Commission  •  Certificate of Appropriateness  •  Upper West Side,Manhattan
    07/15/2010   •    Leave a Comment

    Condo board demolished eleventh-floor balcony during facade restoration without Landmarks’ approval. On June 15, 2010, Landmarks approved a proposal to reconstruct an illegally demolished balcony on a twelve-story condominium at 105 West 72nd Street in the Upper West Side/Central Park West Historic District. The condominium board removed the eleventh-floor balcony of the building in 1992 without Landmarks’ approval. In 2004, Landmarks denied the board’s application to legalize the demolition. Four years later, the board filed plans to reconstruct the terra cotta and brick balcony, but later determined the project was not feasible due to engineering problems. The board instead applied to Landmarks to build a fiberglass balcony with different dimensions than the original.

    At a June 15 public hearing, Shelly Mazor, president of the condominium board, testified that the original balcony had been removed because it presented a hazardous condition. Mazor said the board had tried to recreate the original balcony, but safety issues derailed the plan. She claimed the proposed fiberglass balcony, a purely decorative element, would be aesthetically correct and replicate the original balcony from street views. Architect Robert James explained that the original balcony projected 36 inches from the facade, and it was supported by outriggers built into the wall. Because these outriggers were removed with the original balcony, there was no longer a structurally safe way for the masonry wall to support the weight of a new brick and terra cotta structure. James proposed building a decorative balcony that would only project ten inches and would be inaccessible to tenants. The non-functioning balcony would be painted to emulate the original brick and terra cotta pattern.

    Landmarks Chair Robert B. Tierney noted that local Council Member Gail Brewer had submitted a letter in support and that Manhattan Community Board 7 also approved. A Landmark West representative testified that the illegal removal was a result of the owner’s “cavalier attitude toward landmark regulation.” The Historic District Council’s Nadezhda Williams opposed the use of fiberglass, noting that lightweight terra cotta castings could be used.

    Commissioner Joan Gerner supported the proposal, noting that Landmarks had approved the use of fiberglass for decorative features numerous times. Commissioner Libby Ryan, however, argued that because the condo board was asking Landmarks to make a “significant” compromise by accepting the use of fiberglass, the board should recreate the balcony to its original dimensions.

    Landmarks approved the plan, with Commissioners Roberta Washington and Libby Ryan opposing.

    LPC: 105 West 72nd Street, Manhattan (10-8871) (June 15, 2010) (Architect: Robert James).

    Share this:

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    Tags : Landmarks, Manhattan Community Board 7, Robert James, Shelly Mazor
    Category : Landmarks Preservation Commission

    Comment on this article

    Click here to cancel reply.

    Subscribe To Free Alerts

    In a Reader

    Desktop Reader Bloglines Google Live Netvibes Newsgator Yahoo! What's This?

    Follow Us on Social Media

    twitterfacebook

    Search

    Search by Category

      City Council
      CityLaw
      City Planning Commission
      Board of Standards & Appeals
      Landmarks Preservation Commission
      Economic Development Corporation
      Housing Preservation & Development
      Administrative Decisions
      Court Decisions
      Filings and Decisions
      CityLand Profiles

    Search by Date

    © 1997-2010 New York Law School | 185 West Broadway, New York, NY 10013 | 212.431.2100 | Privacy | Terms | Code of Conduct | DMCA | Policies
    loading Cancel
    Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
    Email check failed, please try again
    Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.