logo CityLand
      • Home
      • About CityLand
      • CityLand Sponsors
      • Filings & Decisions
      • Commentary
      • Archive
      • Resources
      • CityLaw
      • Current Issue

    No Dedicated Lane in Court for Bike Riders


    Commentary  •  Ross Sandler
    03/01/2014   •    (1) Comment

     

    Ross Sandler

    Ross Sandler

    More and more tort cases involve bike riders. Three recent cases demonstrate that injured bike riders may have difficulty in court.

    CityLaw reported a case, 19 CityLaw 100 (2013), involving a bike rider in Fort Washington Park who encountered Sanitation workers cleaning graffiti. The workers had coned off the area, and the biker, to avoid the cones, rode onto the grass where he fell and broke several teeth. The Appellate Division dismissed his claim against the City. The actions by the Sanitation workers were part of a discretionary governmental function and were, therefore, immune from liability. This is an established judicial precedent for traffic applied to a bike rider.

    In another case, a car knocked down a bike rider midway through a Staten Island intersection. The bike rider testified that he had a clear view, was looking ahead and never saw the car which hit him. The driver testified that he had come to a full stop, looked both ways, saw no vehicles, and entered the intersection. The Appellate Division ruled that a jury had to decide whether the bike rider, the driver, or both, were negligent.

    In a third case a summer camp counselor was shepherding young children across the roadway in Central Part at West Drive and 96th Street. The counselor had the “walk” light and was holding a stop sign. Some bikers on the roadway stopped, but the plaintiff, the counselor claimed, came through the intersection and was about to hit the children. To protect the children, she pushed the bike rider who fell and was injured. The counselor claimed it was an emergency and she acted to protect the children. The bike rider claimed that he had come to a stop, or maybe a near stop, and that the counselor jumped in front of his bike, causing him to fall. The Appellate court ruled that the jury had to decide who was at fault.

    City DOT reported that in 2012 City bike riders experienced 4,207 injuries and 20 fatalities, and caused 244 injuries to pedestrians. These statistics are low since DOT only counts injuries reported to the police. DOT advises bike riders to follow the rules of the road. This is good advice because bike riders, as these cases indicate, will not automatically get a green light in court.

    Ross Sandler

     

    Share this:

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    Tags : CityLaw, Commentary, Ross Sandler
    Category : Commentary

    Comment on this article

    Click here to cancel reply.

    Subscribe To Free Alerts


    Follow Us on Social Media

    twitterfacebook

    Search

    Search by Category

      City Council
      CityLaw
      City Planning Commission
      Board of Standards & Appeals
      Landmarks Preservation Commission
      Economic Development Corporation
      Housing Preservation & Development
      Administrative Decisions
      Court Decisions
      Filings and Decisions
      CityLand Profiles

    Search by Date

    © 1997-2010 New York Law School | 185 West Broadway, New York, NY 10013 | 212.431.2100 | Privacy | Terms | Code of Conduct | DMCA | Policies
     

    Loading Comments...