Succession Rights Granted in Mitchell-Lama Co-op

Mitchell-Lama Co-op

Image Credit:

Downs syndrome grand-nephew sought succession rights to Mitchell-Lama cooperative apartment. On February 3, 2012, the permanent tenant of Lindsay Park Housing Corp., a Mitchell-Lama affordable housing cooperative, died. Following her death, the New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development ruled that the grand-nephew, Haile King-Rubie, who resided with the deceased did not have succession rights to the apartment. Haile King-Rubie, who has Down syndrome, filed a petition to review this decision.

Under the Mitchell-Lama rules, the occupancy rights of a family member with a disability is entitled to succession rights if the family member lived with the permanent tenant for a period of not less than one year immediately prior to the tenant’s vacating of the apartment, and the family member had appeared on the income documentation for at least the reporting period immediately prior to the permanent tenant vacating.

The Appellate Division, Second Department overturned the decision of HPD and ruled that King-Rubie had succession rights. King-Rubie established that he was a family member and resided with his great aunt in the subject apartment as his primary residence for the relevant one-year co-residency period prior to his great-aunt’s death. King-Rubie also submitted income affidavits which demonstrated that he was included as a member of his great-aunt’s household. Beyond the income affidavits, King-Rubie submitted numerous additional records from banks, schools and health insurance companies that proved the co-residency. Under these circumstances, it was established that King-Rubie was entitled to succession rights to the subject apartment.

Matter of King-Rubie v. Wambua, 34 N.Y.S.3d 590 (2d Dep’t 2016) (Attorneys: Marc P. Gershman, for King-Rubie; Zachary W. Carter, Richard P. Dearing, Jonathan A. Popolow, for City).

By: Nicole Santo (Nicole is a student writer for CityLaw and student at New York Law School, Class of 2018).

2 thoughts on “Succession Rights Granted in Mitchell-Lama Co-op

  1. Nicole Santo:
    After reading the above article, I thought about the aunt’s stock certificate.
    My mother passed on June 23, 2013. I received a letter from Riverbay Corporation dated 1/16/15 regarding my mother’s equity refund amount. She lived in Coop City in the Bronx. Her sister was entitled to succession rights. I was told her sister is not living in my mother’s apartment.
    The letter indicated I will receive a breakdown sheet regarding any possible equity refund. My mother only paid $2,000 for her stock.
    I have reached out to the Sales Support Office and as of date, I have not receive this breakdown sheet. Was there a stock pass-on in the case above?

  2. I live in Electchester Housing which is also a Mitchell-Lama Co-op in Fresh Meadows, Queens, NY. I’ve lived here since 1994 when my son was 3mos old and he has lived here 27yrs., now. I got in after I wrote a letter to Electchester and paid my shares. At the time I was a member of Local Union 3 and my husband was in Local 32BJ. My son is now a 3rd yr. Apprentice for Local Union 3 as well and that’s who these co-ops were for when I came here. I was told he does not have the right to this apt. if anything happens to my husband or myself. I was also told only Parents are on the lease and no children but if something were to happen to us my son would have to ‘Meet the criteria from a Supervisory Agent. Is this even legal.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.