logo CityLand
      • Home
      • About CityLand
      • CityLand Sponsors
      • Filings & Decisions
      • Commentary
      • Archive
      • Resources
      • CityLaw
      • Current Issue

    Local Law to preserve housing preempted


    Court Decisions  •  City Council  •  Citywide
    06/15/2007   •    Leave a Comment

    Affordable housing programs controlled by federal and state law. After multiple hearings on the declining number of affordable housing units, the City Council passed Local Law 79 of 2005 over a mayoral veto. The law gave tenants the right of first refusal to purchase their buildings when the owners sought to remove the properties from certain assisted rental housing programs. The law also allowed tenants who did not purchase their building to stay in their units at existing rent levels after their buildings left the programs. The law covered Mitchell- Lama developments, project-based Section 8 developments, and other developments receiving government subsidies or assistance.

    The Real Estate Board of New York sued, arguing that the law was invalid since the City did not have the authority to legislate in an area dominated by state and federal law.

    Justice Marilyn Shafer agreed with REBNY and overturned the local law, finding that the City did not have the authority to legislate in this area because the state and federal governments preempted City action. With regard to Mitchell- Lama, state law granted owners a right to withdraw from the program and the City could not impose additional restrictions that would burden that right. Justice Shafer found that the federal laws in the area similarly preempted any action by the City.

    Real Estate Board v. City Council, 2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 27210 (N.Y. Cty.Sup.Ct. Apr. 11, 2007) (Shafer, J.).

    CITYLANDComment: On April 17, 2007, Mayor Bloomberg signed two bills passed by the City Council earlier in the year which aim to encourage owners of Mitchell-Lama housing to keep their buildings in the program by providing new tax incentives. The bills extended the J- 51 tax program to Mitchell-Lama buildings that finance renovations with public monies and eliminated a reference that prohibited abatements for units assessed at over $40,000. The J-51 tax program provides real property tax abatements for major building-wide rehabilitation or replacement systems such as boilers, roofs, or elevators

    Share this:

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    Tags : 2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 27210, Real Estate Board v. City Council
    Category : Court Decisions

    Comment on this article

    Click here to cancel reply.

    Subscribe To Free Alerts


    Follow Us on Social Media

    twitterfacebook

    Search

    Search by Category

      City Council
      CityLaw
      City Planning Commission
      Board of Standards & Appeals
      Landmarks Preservation Commission
      Economic Development Corporation
      Housing Preservation & Development
      Administrative Decisions
      Court Decisions
      Filings and Decisions
      CityLand Profiles

    Search by Date

    © 1997-2010 New York Law School | 185 West Broadway, New York, NY 10013 | 212.431.2100 | Privacy | Terms | Code of Conduct | DMCA | Policies