logo CityLand
      • Home
      • About CityLand
      • CityLand Sponsors
      • Filings & Decisions
      • Commentary
      • Archive
      • Resources
      • CityLaw
      • Current Issue

    Court dismisses Lower East Side lawsuit


    Court Decisions  •  City Planning Commission  •  East Village/Lower East Side, Manhattan
    02/15/2010   •    Leave a Comment

    Residents and community groups unsuccessfully challenged the City’s 111-block rezoning. In May 2008, the Department of City Planning proposed a 111-block rezoning in the East Village and Lower East Side neighborhoods of Manhattan. The rezoning sought to preserve the area’s low- and mid-rise character by applying contextual zoning districts establishing maximum building heights and channeling new construction to areas suitable for development. The proposal included applying the City’s Inclusionary Housing Program provisions to certain zoning districts to promote the development of affordable housing.

    The City Planning Commission prepared a final environmental impact statement, which concluded that the rezoning would not result in any significant adverse socioeconomic impacts, and the City Council approved the rezoning. 5 CityLand 165 (Dec. 2008).

    A group of organizations and residents living and working within the rezoning area challenged the FEIS. The residents claimed that the FEIS failed to account for the significant socioeconomic differences of the neighborhoods within the rezoning area and that the rezoning would disproportionately impact the area’s low-income communities of color. The residents argued that the blocks rezoned to allow for taller and bulkier buildings would lead to an increase in luxury development in areas predominantly populated by people of color, who were more vulnerable to displacement.

    Justice Walter J. Tolub denied the petition, ruling the residents did not present any evidence demonstrating the City failed to take a “hard look” at potential adverse impacts. The residents disagreed with the City’s methodologies and conclusions, but according to Justice Tolub, the FEIS followed the City’s guidelines and was supported with a reasoned analysis.

    Chinese Staff & Workers Assn. v. Bloomberg, 2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 29521 (N.Y.Cty.Sup.Ct. Dec. 24, 2009) (Tolub, J.) (Attorneys: Stanley Mark, for petitioners; Michael A. Cardozo, Carrie Noteboom, for Bloomberg).

    Share this:

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    Tags : City’s Inclusionary Housing Program, Department of City Planning, east village rezoning, FEIS, Justice Walter J. Tolub, lower east side rezoning
    Category : Court Decisions

    Comment on this article

    Click here to cancel reply.

    Subscribe To Free Alerts

    In a Reader

    Desktop Reader Bloglines Google Live Netvibes Newsgator Yahoo! What's This?

    Follow Us on Social Media

    twitterfacebook

    Search

    Search by Category

      City Council
      CityLaw
      City Planning Commission
      Board of Standards & Appeals
      Landmarks Preservation Commission
      Economic Development Corporation
      Housing Preservation & Development
      Administrative Decisions
      Court Decisions
      Filings and Decisions
      CityLand Profiles

    Search by Date

    © 1997-2010 New York Law School | 185 West Broadway, New York, NY 10013 | 212.431.2100 | Privacy | Terms | Code of Conduct | DMCA | Policies
    loading Cancel
    Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
    Email check failed, please try again
    Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.