logo CityLand
      • Home
      • About CityLand
      • CityLand Sponsors
      • Filings & Decisions
      • Commentary
      • Archive
      • Resources
      • CityLaw
      • Current Issue

    Construction Co. loses noise case


    CityLaw  •  Construction noise  •  Midtown, Manhattan
    08/12/2022   •    Leave a Comment

    Steel plates outside of 159 West 48th Street. Image Credit: Google Maps.

    OATH Appeals Board overturns Hearing Officer’s earlier determination. On October 14, 2020, in front of 159 West 48th Street in Manhattan, an officer from the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) detected unreasonable noise from steel street plates permeating from Triumph’s Construction site, an indication that the steel plates were installed improperly.  The officer measured the noise decibels emitting from the steel plates, confirmed it exceeded the mandated limit, and issued Triumph Construction a summons.

    At a hearing held on February 3, 2021, Triumph Construction did not contest the noise decibel readings, but argued it had not received any notice of correction action from the Department of Transportation (DOT) that the street plate was installed improperly and therefore, was not on notice of any violating condition.  Additionally, Triumph Construction argued that a steel street plate is not a “construction device” within the meaning of the noise code.  Hearing Officer Tony Feldmesser agreed with Triumph Construction, found that DEP failed to prove the charge by a preponderance of the evidence, and dismissed the summons.

    On appeal, The OATH Appeals Board reversed the hearing officer’s dismissal, finding that the hearing officer erred in concluding that a steel street plate is not a construction device as that term is defined in the noise code.  The Board held that steel plates used to protect and cover street excavations are deemed construction devices that require a noise mitigation plan.  In addition, the Board ruled that the lack of notice does not establish a defense, as DOT was under no obligation to advise Triumph Construction that the plates had been installed incorrectly.  Triumph Construction is required to pay the civil penalty of $560.

    DEP v. Triumph Construction, OATH Hearings Division Appeals Unit Appeal No. 2100638 (July 22, 2021)

    By: Christopher Devivo (Christopher is a New York Law School graduate, Class of 2022.)

     

     

    Share this:

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    Category : CityLaw

    Comment on this article

    Click here to cancel reply.

    Subscribe To Free Alerts


    Follow Us on Social Media

    twitterfacebook

    Search

    Search by Category

      City Council
      CityLaw
      City Planning Commission
      Board of Standards & Appeals
      Landmarks Preservation Commission
      Economic Development Corporation
      Housing Preservation & Development
      Administrative Decisions
      Court Decisions
      Filings and Decisions
      CityLand Profiles

    Search by Date

    © 1997-2010 New York Law School | 185 West Broadway, New York, NY 10013 | 212.431.2100 | Privacy | Terms | Code of Conduct | DMCA | Policies
     

    Loading Comments...