logo CityLand
      • Home
      • About CityLand
      • CityLand Sponsors
      • Filings & Decisions
      • Commentary
      • Archive
      • Resources
      • CityLaw
      • Current Issue

    Buildings Exempted from Rent Law


    Court Decisions  •  Rent Regulation  •  Red Hook, Brooklyn
    03/24/2017   •    Leave a Comment
    rent law

    Image Credit: GoogleMaps.

    Red Hook developer converted commercial buildings into residential apartments. Harbor Tech LLC in 1999 purchased a commercial complex located in the Red Hook neighborhood of Brooklyn that had been built in the 1920s and used continuously for commercial purposes. Harbor Tech by 2005 had converted the five interlaced buildings of the complex into 100 residential units.

    Thirty-five residents of the complex in 2013 sued Harbor Tech to have the City’s Rent Stabilization Law applied to the complex. In response, Harbor Tech argued that the complex was exempt from the Rent Stabilization Code because the buildings were “substantially rehabilitated” as residential units after 1974. The residents argued that the exemption did not apply because the regulations define “substantially rehabilitated” as requiring the replacement of at least 75 percent of the building-wide and apartment systems. The Supreme Court rejected the tenants’ argument, ruling that rent stabilization laws did not apply because the complex had been converted from commercial to residential, and the percentage of systems replaced was irrelevant.

    The Appellate Division, Second Department, affirmed and ruled that the residents’ apartments were not subject to rent stabilization. The court ruled that a natural reading of the “substantially rehabilitated” regulation limited the rule to situations where the owner purports to rehabilitate an existing residential building. The Second Department, agreeing with a First Department opinion, ruled that “the conversion of a purely commercial space into an almost purely residential space . . . is a substantial rehabilitation” and therefore exempt from rent stabilization.

    Bartis v. Harbor Tech LLC, 2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 08831 (2nd Dep’t Dec. 28, 2016) (Attorneys: Jack L. Lester, for Bartis; Michael Liskow, Alexander H. Schmidt, for Harbor Tech).

    By: Jonathon Sizemore (Jonathon is the CityLaw Fellow and a New York Law School Graduate, Class of 2016).

    Share this:

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    Tags : Appellate Division Second Department, Red Hook, Rent Stabilization Law
    Category : Court Decisions

    Comment on this article

    Click here to cancel reply.

    Subscribe To Free Alerts


    Follow Us on Social Media

    twitterfacebook

    Search

    Search by Category

      City Council
      CityLaw
      City Planning Commission
      Board of Standards & Appeals
      Landmarks Preservation Commission
      Economic Development Corporation
      Housing Preservation & Development
      Administrative Decisions
      Court Decisions
      Filings and Decisions
      CityLand Profiles

    Search by Date

    © 1997-2010 New York Law School | 185 West Broadway, New York, NY 10013 | 212.431.2100 | Privacy | Terms | Code of Conduct | DMCA | Policies
     

    Loading Comments...