logo CityLand
      • Home
      • About CityLand
      • CityLand Sponsors
      • Filings & Decisions
      • Commentary
      • Archive
      • Resources
      • CityLaw
      • Current Issue

    Brooklyn Daycare Center Approved Despite C of O


    Department Of Buildings  •  DayCare Center  •  Bedford-Stuyvesant
    02/19/2018   •    Leave a Comment

    Licensed family daycare center operated in dwelling with residential C of O. Diversity Learning Center, located on the first floor of a three-story building at 193 Sumpter Street in Brooklyn, has operated for 10 years providing day care and educational services. On December 9, 2014, a Buildings officer determined that the operation of Diversity Learning Center conflicted, the certificate of occupancy for the premises. The officer issued a summons charging the owner, Moses Otote, with violating the New York City Administration Code Section 28-119.3.2, which prohibits any change in occupancy or use inconsistent with that allowed by the issued certification of occupancy.

    At the hearing, Buildings submitted the certification of occupancy, which authorized a dwelling unit on each of the first through third floors, not a day care center. Otote, in defense, submitted a group family day care license as well as a letter of no objection from Buildings to use the first floor apartment as a day care for no more than twelve children. The hearing officer rejected Otote’s defense, finding that his use of the premises as a day care center was contrary to the use authorized by the certification of occupancy.

    On appeal, Otote argued that he operated a group family daycare center that had a valid certification of occupancy, not a day care center as alleged by the issuing officer. The Appeals Board credited Otote’s license and letter of no objection citing State law that precluded Building’s from prohibiting or restricting a use of a multiple dwelling for a group family day care where a license for such use has been issued. Accordingly, the Board held that the hearing officer’s decision was not supported by law and granted the appeal.

    NYC v. Otote, OATH Appeal No. 1700589 (July 20, 2017). CityADMIN

    By: Danielle Hendler (Danielle is a student at New York Law School, Class of 2019)

    Share this:

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    Category : Department Of Buildings

    Comment on this article

    Click here to cancel reply.

    Subscribe To Free Alerts


    Follow Us on Social Media

    twitterfacebook

    Search

    Search by Category

      City Council
      CityLaw
      City Planning Commission
      Board of Standards & Appeals
      Landmarks Preservation Commission
      Economic Development Corporation
      Housing Preservation & Development
      Administrative Decisions
      Court Decisions
      Filings and Decisions
      CityLand Profiles

    Search by Date

    © 1997-2010 New York Law School | 185 West Broadway, New York, NY 10013 | 212.431.2100 | Privacy | Terms | Code of Conduct | DMCA | Policies
     

    Loading Comments...