logo CityLand
      • Home
      • About CityLand
      • CityLand Sponsors
      • Filings & Decisions
      • Commentary
      • Archive
      • Resources
      • CityLaw
      • Current Issue

    Carriage Owner Wins Injunction


    CityLaw  •  Parks  •  Central Park, Manhattan
    05/09/2018   •    Leave a Comment

    Horse carriage in Central Park. Image credit: publicdomainpictures.net.

    Central Park Sightseeing, a horse carriage company offering rides in Central Park, sued New Yorkers for Clean, Livable & Safe Streets, an animal rights group based in New York City that is opposed horse-drawn carriages. Central Park Sightseeing claimed that the animal rights group created a public nuisance by interfering with public safety and the safe flow of traffic, and that the animal rights group interfered with the horse carriage business by harassing, threatening, and yelling obscenities at potential customers and intimidating drivers. Central Park Sightseeing produced video evidence that the animal rights group encouraged passengers to leave their carriages and either not pay or request a refund.

    Supreme Court Justice Arthur F. Engoron granted Central Park Sightseeing’s request and enjoined the animal rights group from blocking or touching any person seeking to take a horse carriage ride or who interfered with the horses or the drivers. The injunction also prohibited yelling or aggressively accosting the individuals and horses from a distance of less than nine feet, or handing literature to persons in a horse carriage, or assisting others from doing such things.

    The Appellate Division, First Department, modified the lower Court’s injunction and affirmed the remainder. The modification prohibited any person from knowingly approaching within nine feet of another person in the loading or unloading zone for the purpose of handing out literature or engaging in protest. The court also limited the injunction to apply only to those acting in concert with the named parties. The court stated that the modification was needed to prevent limiting the free speech of others who were unaware of the injunction.

     

    Cent. Park Sightseeing LLC v New Yorkers for Clean, Livable & Safe Streets, Inc., 66 N.Y.S.3d 477 (1st Dep’t 2017) (Attorneys: James A. Goniea, Michael Einbender, for Sightseeing; Randy M. Mastro, Caitlin Halligan, Akiva Shapiro, Gabriel K. Gillet, William J. Moccia, Timothy Sun, Joel Kurtzberg, Peter J. Linken, for New Yorkers)

    By: Chaim K. Chait (Chaim is a New York Law School Student, Class of 2018.)

    Share this:

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    Tags : carriages, horse, horse carriage, parks
    Category : CityLaw

    Comment on this article

    Click here to cancel reply.

    Subscribe To Free Alerts


    Follow Us on Social Media

    twitterfacebook

    Search

    Search by Category

      City Council
      CityLaw
      City Planning Commission
      Board of Standards & Appeals
      Landmarks Preservation Commission
      Economic Development Corporation
      Housing Preservation & Development
      Administrative Decisions
      Court Decisions
      Filings and Decisions
      CityLand Profiles

    Search by Date

    © 1997-2010 New York Law School | 185 West Broadway, New York, NY 10013 | 212.431.2100 | Privacy | Terms | Code of Conduct | DMCA | Policies
     

    Loading Comments...