logo CityLand
      • Home
      • About CityLand
      • CityLand Sponsors
      • Filings & Decisions
      • Commentary
      • Archive
      • Resources
      • CityLaw
      • Current Issue

    Watchtower’s full-block project approved


    City Council  •  Special Permit/Rezoning  •  DUMBO, Brooklyn

    Watchtower reduced height to gain approval of complex. On December 2, 2004, following extensive negotiations between the developer and Council Members Leticia James and David Yassky, the City Council approved the 736,400 sq.ft. development proposed by the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, Inc., subject to a height reduction. The modification, which reduced the street-wall heights of the Front Street buildings to 82 ft. and a maximum height of 110 ft. away from the street, was the second modification agreed to by Watchtower to obtain City approval.

    Watchtower assembled the 135,000 sq.ft. site, encompassing the entire 3-acre city block bounded by Front, Bridge, York and Jay Streets, during the 1980s and the 1990s, but left it vacant. It remains one of the only large, undeveloped parcels in the area, and its location, immediately adjacent to an “F” subway line entrance, makes it a vital entry point for DUMBO.

    Click here to read full article

    Tags : Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, Watchtower Project
    Date: 12/15/2004
    Leave a Comment

    Use variance for mini-storage facility denied


    Court Decisions  •  Board of Standards & Appeals  •  Mill Island, Brooklyn

    Site now used for b us parking lot. Enopac Holding LLC, which since 1995 operated a parking lot for 150- 180 school buses on its property located at 6055 -6065 Strickland Avenue in Brooklyn, sought a use variance from the BSA to allow the construction of six mini-storage buildings on the property. Although the site historically contained several heavy and light industrial uses, including a waste treatment facility, the City rezoned the area in 1996 to residential R3-1.

    BSA denied the variance, finding that six large garage buildings would be extremely detrimental to a proposed adjacent development of 52 semi-detached homes, and would permanently change the character of the residentially- zoned neighborhood. BSA rejected consideration of Enopac’s claim that the 52-unit construction, due to high remediation costs, would be abandoned. BSA also found that, although the parking lot pre-existed the rezoning, it was less permanent than the six proposed structures.

    Click here to read full article

    Tags : 6055 -6065 Strickland Avenue, Enopac Holding LLC, In re Enopac Holding UC v. BSA
    Date: 11/15/2004
    Leave a Comment

    Claim of spot zoning and taking at Seaport rebuffed


    Court Decisions  •  City Council  •  South Street Seaport, Manhattan

    Down-zoning in South Street Seaport upheld. Peck Slip Assoc. LLC, the owner of a surface parking lot at 250 Water Street, sued the City seeking to invalidate City Council’s down-zoning of the South Street Seaport area on a claim that the rezoning made 250 Water Street impossible to develop.

    In April 2003, the City Council approved a South Street Seaport down-zoning, reducing the permitted height and mass of all future development in a l O-block area of Lower Manhattan bounded by Dover, Pearl, Fulton and South Streets. (See map on back.) The rezoned area corresponded to the boundaries of the 1 977 Landmarks designation of the South Street Seaport Historic District, and culminated almost 40 years of City, State and community land use decisions on South Street Seaport.

    Click here to read full article

    Tags : 250 Water Street, Peck Slip Assoc. LLC, Peck Slip Assoc. LLC v. City Council, South Street Seaport Historic District
    Date: 11/15/2004
    Leave a Comment

    Refusal to issue school seating certification upheld


    Court Decisions  •  City Planning Department  •  South Richmond, Staten Island

    Staten Island residential developer denied certification. Salvatore Culotta wanted to build 12 dwelling units in six detached residences on property he owned in the Special South Richmond Development District, a special zoning district created by the City in 1977. Before applying to Buildings for a permit, however, Culotta was required to apply to City Planning for a certification that there was sufficient school capacity to accommodate the expected increase in school children. When Culotta filed for certification in 2004, City Planning withheld it because the property had an outstanding Buildings violation for the alleged unauthorized removal of a tree.

    Culotta filed an article 78 petition to compel City Planning to issue the certification. Justice Eric N. Vitaliano dismissed the petition, finding that, under the Zoning Resolution, City Planning could adopt reasonable guidelines for issuing certifications and that its policy of withholding certificates from a developer with outstanding violations was reasonable. The outstanding Buildings violation would prevent the project from proceeding and issuing a certificate would only serve to hold up school seats that may otherwise be used for other project developments.

    Click here to read full article

    Tags : 2004 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1574, Culotta v. Dep't of City Planning, Salvatore Culotta, Special South Richmond Development District
    Date: 11/15/2004
    Leave a Comment

    Water filtration plant goes forward


    Court Decisions  •  City Council  •  Van Cortlandt Park, Bronx

    Water filtration plant survives two lawsuits. In a 1997 settlement agreement with the federal government, the Department of Environmental Protection agreed to build a filtration plant for the Croton Reservoir. DEP selected 23 acres in Van Cortlandt Park in the Bronx to build the plant. In 200 1 , the Court of Appeals ruled that extended construction on park land required State approval. 7 CityLaw 41 (200 1 ). I n 2003, the state legislature gave the required authorization to construct the plant in the park. In July 2004, DEP completed a supplemental environmental impact statement, and on September 28, 2004, the City Council approved the plant location and construction.

    The Friends of Van Cortlandt Park claimed that the approval violated a zoning resolution requirement that no building permit be issued on former public park land without the Planning Commission’s creation of a new zoning district. The City argued that it had made a determination to override the zoning resolution requirements because the benefits of siting the plant at that location were important, the project was approved for water filtration use only and, designating a zoning district would serve no purpose.

    Click here to read full article

    Tags : Croton Reservoir, Friends of Van Cortlandt Park, Friends of Van Cortlandt Park v. DEP, Index No. 1 1 4036/2004
    Date: 11/15/2004
    Leave a Comment

    Owner fined for not removing unused illegal unit


    Department Of Buildings  •  Violation  •  Queens

    Vacant illegal unit added by a previous owner. Buildings charged Jose Hernandez for maintaining an illegally converted third unit in a two-family dwelling. The cellar of Hernandez’s building was converted prior to his ownership into a separate living unit – including a bedroom, bathroom and kitchen area with a gas line – in violation of the Administrative Code. At the hearing, Hernandez acknowledged the existence of the third unit, but argued that the unit pre-existed his ownership and, since the unit was vacant and used only for storage, no use violation occurred. Rejecting both arguments, the ALJ fined Hernandez $800 for the illegal conversion and $50 per day for 45 days or until the condition was mitigated.

    On appeal, the Environmental Control Board affirmed, ruling that a violation occurred whether or not anyone was living in the unit because the cellar was designed as a separate unit. The Board found that the Code made it a violation to not only add the illegal unit, but to keep it.

    Click here to read full article

    Tags : Jose Hernandez, NYC v. Hernandez
    Date: 11/15/2004
    Leave a Comment
    1. Pages:
    2. «
    3. 1
    4. ...
    5. 679
    6. 680
    7. 681
    8. 682
    9. 683
    10. 684
    11. 685
    12. 686
    13. 687
    14. 688
    15. »

    Subscribe To Free Alerts


    Follow Us on Social Media

    twitterfacebook

    Search

    Search by Category

      City Council
      CityLaw
      City Planning Commission
      Board of Standards & Appeals
      Landmarks Preservation Commission
      Economic Development Corporation
      Housing Preservation & Development
      Administrative Decisions
      Court Decisions
      Filings and Decisions
      CityLand Profiles

    Search by Date

    © 1997-2010 New York Law School | 185 West Broadway, New York, NY 10013 | 212.431.2100 | Privacy | Terms | Code of Conduct | DMCA | Policies