After the City agreed to set aside $6 million for a small business assistance program, the Council approved the redevelopment of a 5.5- acre municipal parking lot. On July 29, 2010, the City Council approved two proposals related to the development of a large mixed-use project on a 5.5-acre municipal parking lot in downtown Flushing, Queens. The 1,101-space lot is bounded by 37th and 39th Avenues and Union and 138th Streets, and is also occupied by the Macedonia AME Church, which faces Union Street.

The 1.89 million sq.ft. development, known as Flushing Commons, is sponsored by the City’s Economic Development Corporation, Rockefeller Group Development Corporation, and TDC Development Corporation. Rockefeller and TDC will construct five buildings around the lot’s perimeter, create a 1.5-acre town square-style open space, and provide 620 market- rate apartments. The project will also include a new YMCA, commercial space, and a 1,600-space underground parking facility.

Under the second proposal, Macedonia AME Church will build a fourteen-story, 140-unit affordable housing project, known as Macedonia Plaza, on the northeast corner of the parking lot. (more…)

One building owner intended to demolish house in order to build seven-story office. On July 13, 2010, Landmarks heard testimony on the possible designation of two separately owned Federal-style rowhouses located at 135 and 206 Bowery in Manhattan’s Lower East Side. When the houses were built in the early 1800s, the Bowery was considered a fashionable upper-class residential and commercial district. While both buildings have undergone extensive alterations, they retain their essential forms and characteristics. Landmarks calendared the buildings on June 15, 2010. Council Member Margaret Chin, whose district includes the Bowery, supported designating both structures.

The 3.5-story house at 135 Bowery was built circa 1817 for John A. Hardenbrook, one of the 24 stock brokers who signed the Buttonwood Agreement that formed the precursor to the New York Stock Exchange. Hardenbrook’s daughter, Rebecca Hardenbrook-Somarindyck later lived in the house, and it remained in the family until 1944. The building’s ground floor historically housed commercial businesses while the upper floors were used as apartments. (more…)

Image: NYCEDC

Municipal parking lot would be replaced with multi-building development offering market-rate and affordable housing and 1.5 acres of open space. On June 23, 2010, the City Planning Commission approved two separate but related proposals that would facilitate the redevelopment of a 5.5-acre, 1,101-space municipal parking lot bounded by 37th and 39th Avenues and Union and 138th Streets in downtown Flushing, Queens. The Commission approved the City Economic Development Corporation, Rockefeller Group Development Corporation, and TDC Development Corporation’s proposal to build a 1.89 million sq.ft. mixed-use project, known as Flushing Commons, on the parking lot. The Commission also approved the Department of Housing Preservation and Development’s proposal to allow the Macedonia AME Church to build an affordable housing project, known separately as Macedonia Plaza, on a portion of the lot not set aside for the Flushing Commons project.

In 2004, the City’s Downtown Flushing Task Force targeted the 5.5- acre municipal lot for redevelopment. After a formal RFP process in June 2005, EDC selected Rockefeller and TDC to redevelop the lot. The proposal would include replacing the lot with a five-building complex, ranging in height from five to seventeen stories, surrounding 1.5 acres of publicly accessible open space. The project would provide 620 units of market rate housing, 405,000 sq.ft. of commercial space, a YMCA, and a 1,600-space underground garage. (more…)

Local Council Member and residents supported the proposed 248-block contextual rezoning, but two property owners requested modifications. On March 24, 2010, the City Planning Commission heard testimony on the Department of City Planning’s contextual rezoning plan for Astoria, Queens. The 248-block study area is generally bounded by 20th Avenue to the north, Broadway to the south, Steinway Street to the east, Vernon Boulevard and the East River to the west, and is divided by the Grand Central Parkway. The proposal builds on three smaller rezonings adopted in the area between 1989 and 2001.

The majority of the area’s northern blocks are currently zoned R5 and characterized by two- and three-story rowhouses and semi-detached homes with consistent building heights and front yards. The area’s southern blocks are predominantly zoned R6 and characterized by large prewar apartment buildings between three and seven stories tall. There are no established height limits in R6 zoning districts, and the maximum FAR for residential uses is 2.43 while community facility uses are permitted to build up to a maximum of 4.8 FAR. As a result, the area has recently experienced development out-of-scale with the neighborhood’s built character. (more…)

Court of Appeals ruled BSA abused discretion in granting variance. GAC Catering Inc. purchased a single-family home at the intersection of Otis Avenue and Hylan Boulevard in Staten Island across the street from its catering business. GAC demolished the house and applied to the BSA for a use variance to build a two-story commercial photography studio to be used in conjunction with GAC’s catering hall. GAC claimed that commercial uses predominated the area, and that it was unable to sell or lease the property as a residence due to heavy traffic on Hylan Boulevard. GAC submitted an economic feasibility study demonstrating that a development in conformity with the lot’s R3-2 zoning would not yield a reasonable rate of return.

BSA granted the variance, and a neighbor filed an Article 78 petition challenging BSA’s determination. A lower court ruled that GAC’s hardship was self-created based on its prior knowledge of the lot’s zoning and annulled the variance. It found nothing in the record to support BSA’s determination that GAC’s lot was unique in comparison to similarly sized, residentially developed adjacent lots. The court added that while the area’s mix of commercial and residential uses may indicate the unreasonableness of the current zoning, it did not prove the uniqueness of GAC’s lot. The City appealed. (more…)