logo CityLand
      • Home
      • About CityLand
      • CityLand Sponsors
      • Filings & Decisions
      • Commentary
      • Archive
      • Resources
      • CityLaw
      • Current Issue

    No documents sinks Triton Structural Concrete extra work claim


    Court Decisions, Department of Design and Construction  •  Extra work  •  Staten Island
    01/17/2018   •    Leave a Comment

    Image Credit: Triton.

    Contractor redesigned and re-fabricated roof of rink as part of a time and materials contract. On September 19, 2013, the Department of Design and Construction awarded a $5.1 million contract to Triton Structural Concrete, Inc. to construct the Ocean Breeze Indoor Horse Riding Arena in Staten Island. The rink was to serve as the headquarters for Helping Others Overcome Personal Handicaps, a therapeutic riding program. Because of 2012’s Superstorm Sandy, the DDC required an enclosed canopy for the rink.  Triton submitted a design for the canopy which was criticized by DDC for not showing how the soffit under the canopy would extend as a continuous structure.  Following additional discussions Triton designed and fabricated the canopy.  When the materials arrived on site, DDC objected to the fabricated materials and required Triton to redesign and reconstruct the canopy.  Triton sought an additional $88,674 for the extra work.

    Associate Commissioner Mark Canu denied Triton’s claim for additional compensation. Triton appealed to the Comptroller who affirmed Commissioner Canu’s denial, and Triton appealed to the Contract Dispute Resolution Board.

    The Contract Dispute Resolution Board rejected Triton’s claim. The Appeals Board found that Triton had failed to follow procedures required under the contract for documenting extra work in a time-and-materials contract.  Triton had failed to submit daily reports showing the name of each worker, the hours worked, the character of the work, and the nature and quantity of materials. Failure to follow these procedures on a time-and-materials contract warranted a denial of the claim.

    The Board also rejected Triton’s contentions that the extra work was to be a lump sum contract, and that the City had waived the reporting procedures by prior practices in other contracts.

    Triton Structural Concrete, Inc. v. Department of Design and Construction, OATH Index No. 1300/17 (Aug. 11, 2017). CityADMIN

    Share this:

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    Category : Court Decisions, Department of Design and Construction

    Comment on this article

    Click here to cancel reply.

    Subscribe To Free Alerts


    Follow Us on Social Media

    twitterfacebook

    Search

    Search by Category

      City Council
      CityLaw
      City Planning Commission
      Board of Standards & Appeals
      Landmarks Preservation Commission
      Economic Development Corporation
      Housing Preservation & Development
      Administrative Decisions
      Court Decisions
      Filings and Decisions
      CityLand Profiles

    Search by Date

    © 1997-2010 New York Law School | 185 West Broadway, New York, NY 10013 | 212.431.2100 | Privacy | Terms | Code of Conduct | DMCA | Policies
     

    Loading Comments...